Re: Platform comparison ...
От | Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Platform comparison ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1016551598.29762.18.camel@atlas обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Platform comparison ... (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 15:52, mlw wrote: > Dale Anderson wrote: > > > > Hello Group, > > I need your help, in putting together a list of comparisons, and good solid technical reasons, to why to use PostgreSQL over using Microsoft SQL Server. Right now, we are using PostgreSQL for a back-end for some of our web stuff. A couple of our developers, which are Microsoft VB developers, are complaining about not being able to use proprietary MS stuff with PostgreSQL. I have told them to use standard SQL92 compliant programming techniques, and all will work just fine. They just don't seem to understand why a person wouldn't use SQL Server. If I could put together a list of good solid technical arguments, (Performance, Support, Reliability, ETC.), as to why PostgreSQL is better, I think I can make a good case in keeping PostreSQL. I just don't have any SQL Server experience to compare with. If any of you, who have SQL Server experience could send me good technical comparisons of SQL Server vs PostgreSQL, I would greatly appreciate it. > > I have worked with MSSQL, Oracle, Sybase, MySQL, and PostgreSQL, I totally > understand what you are going through. > > MSSQL has Hi! I'm sure I'm not the only one interested in seeing your opinion regarding Oracle vs. pg and Sybase vs. pg. (But please not another mysql flamewar here :-) Tx and greets -- vbi
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: