Re: User Level Lock question
| От | Neil Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: User Level Lock question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1016231042.26927.14.camel@jiro обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: User Level Lock question ("Lance Ellinghaus" <lellinghaus@yahoo.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: User Level Lock question
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 14:54, Lance Ellinghaus wrote: > I know it does not sound like something that would need to be done, but here > is why I am looking at doing this... > > I am trying to replace a low level ISAM database with PostgreSQL. The low > level ISAM db allows locking a record during a read to allow Exclusive > access to the record for that process. If someone tries to do a READ > operation on that record, it is skipped. If the locked record is skipped, how can the application be sure it is getting a consistent view of the data? Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: