Re: pg_ctl - tighten command parameter checking
От | Oliver Elphick |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_ctl - tighten command parameter checking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1014501164.13241.4120.camel@linda обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl - tighten command parameter checking (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl - tighten command parameter checking
Re: pg_ctl - tighten command parameter checking |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 21:31, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Oliver, I am going to reject this. We give them the syntax for the > params. I don't see a need to check for leading dash to see if they > forgot a param. I would like to see a more general solution that uses > getopt or something more robust, but moving all that checking to each > param just seems like a waste. I would certainly prefer to use getopt, but is that portable? Peter wants me to use case..esac instead of cut; I would have thought getopt was a lot less portable. -- Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness; That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." II Timothy 3:16,17
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: