Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> I see that I was planning on back-patching this to v16, but since
> is_valid_ascii() was introduced in v15, I'm wondering if it'd be better to
> back-patch it there so that is_valid_ascii() lives in the same file for all
> versions where it exists. Thoughts?
Yeah, if we're going to back-patch at all, that probably makes sense.
regards, tom lane