Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Uh, I was going to add current_database() patch in the patch queue. Is
> that OK? I can apply only that part of the doc patch.
current_database looks pretty harmless. I want to look at get_fkeydef
or whatever it was called, though.
>> I still have to finish up the tail-end work of reviewing Rod'
>> constraints patch, and this stuff is part of that ... it's back to
>> pg_dump for the next couple days for me ...
> Which one was that?
The stuff involving changing the way that pg_dump deals with constraints
and foreign keys and serials (at least two different patches I think).
get_fkeydef is backend support for that.
> Where are we on the prepare statement patch? I saw
> another version appear yesterday or the day before.
I haven't looked at the latest version yet.
regards, tom lane