Re: difficult query (for me)
От | Andrew G. Hammond |
---|---|
Тема | Re: difficult query (for me) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1009641941.1054.2.camel@xyzzy обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | difficult query (for me) (QdlatY <qdlaty@wielun.dhs.org>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Sat, 2001-12-29 at 10:20, QdlatY wrote: > Hello > > I will try to explain my problem as clearly as i can. > > So, I have tree tables > Named: > > Tables > Threads > Posts > > It is typicall structure of discussion phorum. There is no such thing as typical. To help you, we need the exact schema of your database. From the above, it's not clear what the relation between Tables and the rest of your database is. > Now, Tables has a column ID (unique random index) random? Aren't you using the SERIAL type, since this is exactly the kind of thing it's made for? > Threads has a columns ID (index) and TableID (index of one row of tables > table) > Posts has attribute ThreadId and CreateTime > > (i only wrote important columns to this query) > > Now, I have Tables row with ID = 10 > And then i want to have list of all Threads (belongs to Table with id = 10, > so WHERE Threads.TableId = 10) sorted by CreateTime of newest Posts row > belong to every thread. Sounds like you want to use a join with DISTINCT ON the thread id and the ORDER BY clause to sort things by create time. SELECT DISTINCT ON (t.id) * -- or you could list the columns you want FROM threads t, posts p WHERE t.tableid = 10 AND t.id = p.threadid ORDER BY t.id, p.createtime DESC If this will be a common query then you might consider creating an index or two on the tables involved. > F.E. > Table.iD = 10 > > Thread > ID TableID > 1 10 > 2 10 > 3 11 > > Posts > ThreadId CreateTime (i will use nubers only to explain) > 1 10 > 1 20 > 1 25 > 2 43 > 3 02 > > > So i want to have result from Table ID = 10: > Threads > ID > 2 (because CreateTime of Posts from 2 Thread is highest) > 1 (and so on...) > > (Thread 3 not belongs to Table.ID = 10) > > Of course result can contains adequate Posts columns but don't must to... > > I hope you will able to help me, i think it's not difficult but i'm a > little newbie, so, i gave up on this :PPP Hope this helps. -- Andrew G. Hammond mailto:drew@xyzzy.dhs.org http://xyzzy.dhs.org/~drew/ 56 2A 54 EF 19 C0 3B 43 72 69 5B E3 69 5B A1 1F 613-389-5481 5CD3 62B0 254B DEB1 86E0 8959 093E F70A B457 84B1 "To blow recursion you must first blow recur" -- me
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: