Re: Poor performance o

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Poor performance o
Дата
Msg-id 10012.1143001903@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Poor performance o  ("Craig A. James" <cjames@modgraph-usa.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
"Craig A. James" <cjames@modgraph-usa.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Given the sizes of the tables involved, you'd likely have to boost up
>> work_mem before the planner would consider a hash join.  What nondefault
>> configuration settings do you have, anyway?

> shared_buffers = 20000
> work_mem = 32768
> effective_cache_size = 300000

So for a 6M-row table, 32M work_mem would allow ... um ... 5 bytes per
row.  It's not happening :-(

Try boosting work_mem by a factor of 100 and seeing whether a hash-based
join actually wins or not.  If so, we can discuss where the sane setting
really falls, if not there's no point.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: motherboard recommendations
Следующее
От: Guillaume Cottenceau
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: planner with index scan cost way off actual cost,