Re: Quick coding question with acl fixes
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Quick coding question with acl fixes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 10002.1090728051@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Quick coding question with acl fixes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Quick coding question with acl fixes
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>> When I run through the acl changing all references from the old owner to
>> the new owner, should I combine the resulting acls if possible? Because
>> if the new owner already has some acls on that item, they will end up
>> with two acls.
> If possible ... how painful would it be to do?
Actually it looks like you'd better, because for example aclupdate
assumes there's only one entry for a given grantor/grantee pair.
BTW, are you sure Fabien did not already solve this problem in his
pending patch?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: