Re: 8.1.1.0, VB6, RDO, rdoResultset.RowCount
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8.1.1.0, VB6, RDO, rdoResultset.RowCount |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0d5901c5e594$5eb44480$0201a8c0@iwing обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 8.1.1.0, VB6, RDO, rdoResultset.RowCount (Hélder M. Vieira <hmv@mail.telepac.pt>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
hi there this was discussed earlier today i think... the recordset has an EOF (end of file) flag. if rs.EOF equals False, then there are rows in the resultset. cheers, thomas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hélder M. Vieira" <hmv@mail.telepac.pt> To: <pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 2:06 AM Subject: [ODBC] 8.1.1.0, VB6, RDO, rdoResultset.RowCount > Hi. > > > I noticed a difference in behaviour in 8.1.1.0, related with the RowCount > property in RDO resultsets in VB6. > In version 7xxx, for some specific purposes, I used to open a resultset > and immediatly check RowCount. > For non-empty resultsets, at this point in time RowCount would be > innacurate but NOT EQUAL to 0, and based on this first evaluation I would > proceed to the next step, either assuming an empty set or forcing a move > to the last row to obtain a precise RowCount. > In version 8.1.1.0, RowCount always seems to be EQUAL to 0, unless I force > a move to the last row. > At this point, my problem is that I don't know which is the right > behaviour... Should I assume that in this and later versions of the driver > RowCount will always be EQUAL to 0 before visiting the last row ? > > > Thanks in advance. > > > Helder M. Vieira > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings >
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: