On 04/01/2020 01:26, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 04/01/2020 01:21, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> On 03/01/2020 20:14, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>>> I'm unsure about gcd(INT_MIN, 0) should error. Possibly 0 would be nicer?
>>> What justification for that do you have?
>> Zero is the "correct" answer for that, isn't it, independently of overflow
>> considerations?
>
> I would say not. The correct answer is INT_MIN but we've decided a
> negative result is not desirable.
Wolfram Alpha agrees.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=gcd%28-9223372036854775808%2C0%29
--
Vik Fearing