Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.
Дата
Msg-id 0d0dd4ec-d446-f4f2-ab5a-7e999f0a468c@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.  (Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.  (Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 22.04.22 14:26, Amul Sul wrote:
> Yes, I think we can do cleanup to some extent.  Attaching the
> following patches that first intend to remove DirectFunctionCall as
> much as possible:

Do you have any data that supports removing DirectionFunctionCall() 
invocations?  I suppose some performance benefit could be expected, or 
what do you have in mind?

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Refactor construct_array() and deconstruct_array() for built-in types
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Configuration Parameter/GUC value validation hook