Re: Groups and roles

> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > I think the other requirement of roles is that they are able to own
objects.
> > ie. we need to allow groups to own objects.
>
> Hm.  That seems to be another reason to unify usesysid and grosysid into
> a single unique something-id.  Which probably implies unifying pg_shadow
> and pg_group into one table.

Bear in mind that I recalled that from something I thought you (or someone)
said on the list earlier and I thought you had forgotten about...

eg. I don't know that that's a requirement...

Chris