Re: ssl_library parameter

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: ssl_library parameter
Дата
Msg-id 0c9e8c80-ae4d-faab-c4a1-ddb15f50a9c9@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ssl_library parameter  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 6/26/18 17:48, Tom Lane wrote:
> (1) I'm not really clear why we need this.  GUC variables aren't free.
> 
> (2) Are there security issues with exposing this info to everybody?

This functionality was requested in the threads about GnuTLS and other
SSL implementations so that users/admins can determine which SSL
settings are applicable.

I'm not sure about the security impact.  We do expose all the other
ssl_* settings to ordinary users, so if users want to see whether the
server is misconfigured or something like that, they can already do
that.  I think in the context of an SSL connection, the server is not
supposed to be the adversary of the client, so if the server can provide
more information about what it's doing to protect the client's
information, then the better.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: partitioning - changing a slot's descriptor is expensive
Следующее
От: Jeevan Chalke
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Server crashed with TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(parallel_workers >0)" when partitionwise_aggregate true.