Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Here is another patch for autovacuum:
...
> - Xid-wraparound VACUUM is now FULL without ANALYZE

Am I right in my assumption that this VACUUM FULL can happen for any
database, not just a template database?

I think this is a bad idea. Vacuum full is not an option for our and many
other production databases. I suggest that should be a plain VACUUM.

Otherwise I think you have done great job finally integrating auto vacuum
into the backend.

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold