Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Anastasia Lubennikova
Тема Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32
Дата
Msg-id 0a25634d-19b5-4d07-acfc-ccf6ce058fe3@postgrespro.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: Improper use about DatumGetInt32
Список pgsql-hackers
On 02.11.2020 18:59, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I have committed 0003.
>
> For 0001, normal_rand(), I think you should reject negative arguments 
> with an error.

I've updated 0001. The change is trivial, see attached.

>
> For 0002, I think you should change the block number arguments to 
> int8, same as other contrib modules do.
>
Agree. It will need a bit more work, though. Probably a new version of 
pageinspect contrib, as the public API will change.
Ashutosh, are you going to continue working on it?

-- 
Anastasia Lubennikova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bharath Rupireddy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Use standard SIGHUP and SIGTERM handlers in autoprewarm module
Следующее
От: Konstantin Knizhnik
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance