Re: good pc but bad performance,why?
| От | huang yaqin |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: good pc but bad performance,why? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 0HVS00F9Q906F7@mail.gthome.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | good pc but bad performance,why? (huang yaqin <hyq@gthome.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: good pc but bad performance,why?
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
hello!
Thanks, you are right.
I use "postmaster -o "-F" " to start my PG,and performance improved greatly.
Best regards,
huang yaqin
>huang yaqin <hyq@gthome.com> writes:
>> I have some question when I use postgresql 7.4.1 on redhat adv server 2.1 .
>> I use IBM335 as server, it has 4 cpus, 1G RAM. but I got very bad performance.
>> I can only do about 50 inserts per sencond. Event worse than my pc(PIII 800,256M RAM), can anyone give me some
advice?
>
>If the cheap machine appears to be able to commit more transactions
>per second than the better one, it's very likely because the cheap
>machine has a disk that lies about write completion. Is the server
>using SCSI disks by any chance? To a first approximation, IDE drives
>lie by default, SCSI drives don't.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
>
>Powered by MessageSoft SMG
>SPAM, virus-free and secure email
>http://www.messagesoft.com
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
致
礼!
huang yaqin
hyq@gthome.com
2004-04-07
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: