Tsunakawa-san,
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 2:04 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> Can you compare the performance of auto and force_custom_plan again with
> the attached patch? It uses PGPROC's LOCALLOCK list instead of the hash
> table.
Thanks for the patch, but it seems to have some problems.
When I executed create/drop/select commands to large partitions, like over than 512 partitions, backend died
unexpectedly.Since I could see the difference of the performance of auto and force_custom_plan when partitions is
large,patch needs to be modified to check whether performance is improved or not.
Thanks
--
Yoshikazu Imai