Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] What would be difficult to make data models pluggable for making PostgreSQL a multi-model database?
| От | MauMau |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] What would be difficult to make data models pluggable for making PostgreSQL a multi-model database? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 0F4F540B05294D2C82740FA2A220B28B@tunaPC обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] What would be difficult to make data modelspluggable for making PostgreSQL a multi-model database? (Henry M <henrymanmail@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [RFC] What would be difficult to make data modelspluggable for making PostgreSQL a multi-model database?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: Henry M > This may be interesting... they implement cypher (unfortunately they had to fork in order to have cypher be a first class query language with SQL). > > https://github.com/bitnine-oss/agensgraph I'm sorry for my very late reply. Thanks for the information. AgensGraph is certainly interesting, but the problem is that it's a fork of PostgreSQL as you mentioned. I wish the data models, including query languages, to be pluggable extensions, so that various people (especially database researchers?) can develop them flexibly. Of course, I want various data models to be incorporated in the core as early as possible, but I'm afraid it's not easy. If new data models can be added as extensions, they can be developed outside the PostgreSQL community process, get popular and mature, and then be embraced in core like GiST/SP-Gist indexes and full text search did. Regards MauMau
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: