Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats()
| От | David E. Wheeler |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 0C8DBCD6-7D68-4FD6-AE66-12B03AE7671B@justatheory.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Oct 20, 2025, at 22:14, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I do take your point that being able to find things before commit > is helpful. But I think the answer to that is to get this > general-purpose ABI check mechanism sufficiently well product-ized > that committers can run it locally if they choose. Ideally we'd > have multiple BF animals running it, so there's definitely motivation > to get it at least to the point where it doesn't require hand-feeding > by BF owners. (If memory serves, we've had ABI breaks that affected > only 32 bit or only 64 bit machines, and of course there's the > possibility of ones that only manifest with particular feature > selections. So I'm not content with just one animal running it.) FWIW, running it on a Linux animal currently requires just a couple steps 1. Download the module: ```sh curl -LO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MankiratSingh1315/pg-bf-client-code/refs/heads/abi-comp-check/PGBuild/Modules/ABICompCheck.pm mv ABICompCheck.pm build-farm-path/PGBuild/Modules/ ``` 2. Add it to `modules` in `build-farm.conf`, e.g., modules => [qw(TestUpgrade ABICompCheck)], 3. Install the abigail suite; I believe the Debian packages are `abigail-tools` and `libabigail0` I think that’s it. I use `run_branches.pl --run-all` to test all the current maintenance branches. It does not run againstmaster. Best, David
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: