Re: [HACKERS] Keep ECPG comment for log_min_duration_statement

Michael Meskes wrote:
> > Michael Meskes wrote:
> > > The other option I can see, albeit without looking into details, is 
> > > allowing all comments and then testing it for the right syntax after 
> > > parsing. This could potentially also solve the above mentioned 
> > > option problem.
> >
> > This idea sounds great. But I am not sure that I can understand it 
> > correctly.
> >
> > I understood the concept of this idea as following. Is it right?
> > 1. The parser ignores comments/*...*/ as usual. That is, parser does 
> > not
> >   identify comments as a token.
>
> I guess it'd be easier to accept each comment as a token and then parse the token 
> text afterwards.
>
> > 2. After parsing, we parse again only to extract comments.
>
> Not sure if we can do that without creating a lot of overhead.
I see. Based on your advice, I try to make a patch. 
I will attach a patch when I finish it.

Regards,
Okano Naoki
Fujitsu