Re: [HACKERS] Keep ECPG comment for log_min_duration_statement
| От | Okano, Naoki |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Keep ECPG comment for log_min_duration_statement |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 0B4917A40C80E34BBEC4BE1A7A9AB7E27AB083@g01jpexmbkw05 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Keep ECPG comment for log_min_duration_statement (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Keep ECPG comment for log_min_duration_statement
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you for your kind advise! Michael Meskes wrote: > The other option I can see, albeit without looking into details, is > allowing all comments and then testing it for the right syntax after > parsing. This could potentially also solve the above mentioned option > problem. This idea sounds great. But I am not sure that I can understand it correctly. I understood the concept of this idea as following. Is it right? 1. The parser ignores comments/*...*/ as usual. That is, parser does not identify comments as a token. 2. After parsing, we parse again only to extract comments. 3. comments are put back or forth in SQL statement. Regards, Okano Naoki Fujitsu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: