RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Тема RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Дата
Msg-id 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FBED011@G01JPEXMBYT05
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Hari-san,

I've reviewed all the files.  The patch would be OK when the following have been fixed, except for the complexity of
fe-connect.c(which probably cannot be improved.)
 

Unfortunately, I'll be absent next week.  The earliest date I can do the test will be April 8 or 9.  I hope someone
couldtake care of this patch...
 


(1) 0001
With this read-only option type, application can connect to
to a read-only server in the list of hosts, in case
...
before issuing the SHOW transaction_readonly to find out whether


"to" appears twice in a row.
transaction_readonly -> transaction_read_only


(2) 0001
+        succesful connection or failure.

succesful -> successful


(3) 0008
to conenct to a standby server with a faster check instead of

conenct -> connect


(4) 0008
Logically, recovery exit should be notified after the following statement:

    XLogCtl->SharedRecoveryInProgress = false;


(5) 0008
+        /* Update in_recovery status. */
+        if (LocalRecoveryInProgress)
+            SetConfigOption("in_recovery",
+                            "on",
+                            PGC_INTERNAL, PGC_S_OVERRIDE);
+

This SetConfigOption() is called for every RecoveryInProgress() call on the standby.  It may cause undesirable
overhead. How about just calling SetConfigOption() once in InitPostgres() to set the initial value for in_recovery?
InitPostgres()and its subsidiary functions call SetConfigOption() likewise.
 


(6) 0008
async.c is for LISTEN/UNLISTEN/NOTIFY.  How about adding the new functions in postgres.c like
RecoveryConflictInterrupt()?


(7) 0008
+        if (pid != 0)
+        {
+            (void) SendProcSignal(pid, reason, procvxid.backendId);
+        }

The braces are not necessary because the block only contains a single statement.


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Следующее
От: Hadi Moshayedi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Multitenancy optimization