RE: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations areaccessed in a transaction

Hi Peter, Imai-san,

From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com]
> Your changes in LOCALLOCK still refer to PGPROC, from your first version
> of the patch.
> 
> I think the reordering of struct members could be done as a separate
> preliminary patch.
> 
> Some more documentation in the comment before dlist_head LocalLocks to
> explain this whole mechanism would be nice.

Fixed.


> You posted a link to some performance numbers, but I didn't see the test
> setup explained there.  I'd like to get some more information on this
> impact of this.  Is there an effect with 100 tables, or do you need 100000?

Imai-san, can you tell us the test setup?


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa