RE: Timeout parameters
От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Timeout parameters |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FBDE818@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Timeout parameters (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Timeout parameters
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com] > I don't think so. I think it's just a weirdly-design parameter > without a really compelling use case. Enforcing limits on the value > of the parameter doesn't fix that. Most of the reviewers who have > opined so far have been somewhere between cautious and negative about > the value of that parameter, so I think we should just not add it. At > least for now. I don't think socket_timeout is so bad. I think Nagaura-san and I presented the use case, giving an answer to every questionand concern. OTOH, it may be better to commit the tcp_user_timeout patch when Nagaura-san has refined the documentation,and then continue socket_timeout. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: