From: MikalaiKeida@ibagroup.eu [mailto:MikalaiKeida@ibagroup.eu]
> Based on your comment it seems to me that 'socket_timeout' should be
> connected with statement_timeout. I mean that end-user should wait
> statement_timeout + 'socket_timeout' for returning control. It looks much
> more safer for me.
I'm afraid we cannot enforce that relationship programmatically, so I think the documentation should warn that
socket_timeoutbe longer than statement_timeout.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa