RE: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at theend of relation

From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael@paquier.xyz]
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 03:59:21PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > Also, I think that this test may fail in case where concurrent
> > transactions are running. So maybe should not run it in parallel to
> > other tests.
> 
> That's why autovacuum is disabled in this specific test, no?  A comment
> may be a good idea.

Exactly.  The table is disabled for autovacuum to avoid being influenced by autovacuum.


Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa