Hi Amit,
From: Amit Langote [mailto:Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp]
> Maybe I chose the the subject line of this thread poorly when I began
> working on it. It should perhaps have been something like "speeding up
> planning of point-lookup queries with many partitions" or something like
> that. There are important use cases beyond point lookup even with
> partitioned tables (or maybe more so with partitioned tables), but perhaps
> unsurprisingly, the bottlenecks in those cases are not *just* in the
> planner.
No, it's simply my fault. I wasn't aware of the CF Bot and the CF entry page that act on the latest submitted patch.
I'mrelieved to see you have submitted the revised patch.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa