RE: PostgreSQL Limits and lack of documentation about them.
От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
---|---|
Тема | RE: PostgreSQL Limits and lack of documentation about them. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FAE85A2@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL Limits and lack of documentation about them. (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: David Rowley [mailto:david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com] > I think it's a bit strange that we don't have this information fairly > early on in the official documentation. I only see a mention of the > 1600 column limit in the create table docs. Nothing central and don't > see mention of 32 TB table size limit. > > I don't have a patch, but I propose we include this information in the > docs, perhaps on a new page in the preface part of the documents. > > Does anyone else have any thoughts about this? +1 As a user, I feel I would look for such information in appendix like "A Database limits" in Oracle's Database Reference manual: https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/18/refrn/database-limits.html#GUID-ED26F826-DB40-433F-9C2C-8C63A46A3BFE As a somewhat related topic, PostgreSQL doesn't mention the maximum values for numeric parameters. I was asked several timesthe questions like "what's the maximum value for max_connections?" and "how much memory can I use for work_mem?" Idon't feel a strong need to specify those values, but I wonder if we should do something. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: