RE: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents?
От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
---|---|
Тема | RE: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FA4A102@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending)patents? (Markus Wanner <markus.wanner@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: Markus Wanner [mailto:markus.wanner@2ndquadrant.com] > equally sure there are well intended ones as well. For example, I'd > expect patent pools (including the Open Invention Network, cited by the > OP) to hire non-IANAL personnel who know Legalese well enough to setup > valid contracts (between participating companies). I think I'll consult Open Invention Network on this issue, since I haven't received any reply from SFLC. > I certainly like the (future) patent holder coming forth to offer a > grant a lot better than the one who doesn't (but still holds the > patent). I'm missing the appreciation for that former strategy in this > thread and fear we're setting a precedent for the latter one, instead. Me too. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: