Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tsunakawa, Takayuki
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified
Дата
в 05:49:07
Msg-id
0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F6F9873@G01JPEXMBYT05
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[HACKERS] [doc fix] PG10: wroing description on connect_timeout when multiplehosts are specified "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
[HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description on connect_timeout whenmultiple hosts are specified "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
[HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description on connect_timeout whenmultiple hosts are specified "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
[HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description on connect_timeout whenmultiple hosts are specified Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [doc fix] PG10: wroing description onconnect_timeout when multiple hosts are specified Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier
> pqWait is internal to libpq, so we are free to set up what we want here.
> Still I think that we should be consistent with what pqSocketCheck returns:

Please let this what it is now for the same reason Robert mentioned.

> +    int            ret = 0;
> +    int            timeout = 0;
> The declaration of "ret" should be internal in the for(;;) loop.

Done.


> +           /* Attempt connection to the next host, starting the
> connect_timeout timer */
> +           pqDropConnection(conn, true);
> +           conn->addr_cur = conn->connhost[conn->whichhost].addrlist;
> +           conn->status = CONNECTION_NEEDED;
> +           finish_time = time(NULL) + timeout;
> +       }
> I think that it would be safer to not set finish_time if
> conn->connect_timeout is NULL. I agree that your code works because
> pqWaitTimed() will never complain on timeout reached if finish_time is -1.
> That's for robustness sake.

Done, but I'm not sure how this contributes to the robustness.  I guess you were concerned just in case pqWaitTimed() returned 0 (timeout) even when it should not.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
FAQ