Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files
| От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F6BC00B@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Potential data loss of 2PC files
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier > Do you think that this qualifies as a bug fix for a backpatch? I would think > so, but I would not mind waiting for some dust to be on it before considering > applying that on back-branches. Thoughts from others? I think so, too. As change from rename() to durable_rename() was applied to all releases, maybe we can follow that. Inaddition, keeping code differences as few as possible would make it easier for committers to apply other bug fixes to allversions. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: