Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Make pg_stop_backup() archive wait optional
От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Make pg_stop_backup() archive wait optional |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F6B3FC5@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Make pg_stop_backup() archive wait optional (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki > <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > BTW, does the developer of each feature have to modify the catalog version > in catversion.h? It's a bit annoying to see the patch application failure > on catversion.h. > > Committers take care of this part. I understood the committer modifies the catalog version based on the patch content, so the patch submitter doesn't have tomodify it. I'm relieved. > > Isn't it enough to modify the catalog version only when > alpha/beta/RC/final versions are released? > > That's useful at least for developers to bump it even during a development > cycle as you can notice with a hard failure at startup if a data folder > you have created is compatible with the new binaries or not. Oh, you're absolutely right. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: