Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Amit Langote [mailto:Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp]
> On 2016/12/09 10:09, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> > Another requirement was subpartitioning.  Will this be possible with the
> current infrastructure, or does this need drastic change?
> 
> It does support sub-partitioning, although the syntax is a bit different.

Super great!  I'm excited to try the feature when I have time.  I hope I can contribute to the quality by find any
bug.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa