Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres
От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F5C2668@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Geoghegan > I think that the best thing about C++ is the ability to encapsulate and > simplify some aspects of resource management quite well, which necessitates > reimplementing PG_TRY/CATCH. The worst thing about C++ is that ABI > compatibility is far messier. This makes a C++ port seem less compelling > to me than the idea first appears. From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Christopher > Further, it's not as if C++ is particularly newer than C. C is about 45 > years old; C++, at 33, hardly seems like a "spry young whippersnapper" > whose inclusion ought to lead to vast excitement. > > The would-be "spry young things" that head to my mind are Rust and Go. I'm > not sure it's terribly plausible to have parts of Postgres written in both > C and (Rust|Go); they're different enough that I'm not sure what > functionality would mix sensibly. But I think that would be more > interesting, all the same. Perhaps it would work out well to be able to > create background workers in Rust, or to implement a stored procedure > language in Go. First, I'm neither for nor against rewriting PostgreSQL in C++. But I wonder whether it would really pay for the cost. I'm worried about these, for example: * Wouldn't it increase the coding and testing burdon? Coding and testing in C, and coding and testing in C++. PostgreSQLseem to have many features to develop, and I'm not sure C++ will help to speed up the development of them. * Would it really attract more developers of PostgreSQL itself, not extensions? FYI, Tiobe Index says C is nearly twiceas popular as C++. http://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/ * Wouldn't it distance some developers if they don't want to learn C++? As Christopher said, C++ is old and there are manynewer languages that attract developers -- C#, Swift, Go, Java, JavaScript, etc. I wonder whether recent developerswant to spend time in learning complex C++ now. I learned C++ because it is still the most popular language ingame development, but maybe I would not want to learn C++ anymore if I didn't know C++. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: