Re: Wait events monitoring future development
От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wait events monitoring future development |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F5C01F2@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Wait events monitoring future development (Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Wait events monitoring future development
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > I used to think of that this kind of features should be enabled by default, > because when I was working at the previous company, I had only few features > to understand what is happening inside PostgreSQL by observing production > databases. I needed those features enabled in the production databases when > I was called. > > However, now I have another opinion. When we release the next major release > saying 10.0 with the wait monitoring, many people will start their benchmark > test with a configuration with *the default values*, and if they see some > performance decrease, for example around 10%, they will be talking about > it as the performance decrease in PostgreSQL 10.0. It means PostgreSQL will > be facing difficult reputation. > > So, I agree with the features should be disabled by default for a while. I understand your feeling well. This is a difficult decision. Let's hope for trivial overhead. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: