> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Yeah, I think I agree. It would be bad to disable it by default on Unix,
> because ps(1) is a very standard tool there, but the same argument doesn't
> hold for Windows.
It seems that we could reach a consensus. The patch is attached. I'll add this to the next CommitFest.
> Another route to a solution would be to find a cheaper way to update the
> process title on Windows ... has anyone looked for alternatives?
I couldn't find an alternative solution after asking some Windows support staff.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa