Re: Please take part in the PostgreSQL ecosystem survey
От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Please take part in the PostgreSQL ecosystem survey |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F56E5D4@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Please take part in the PostgreSQL ecosystem survey (Sumedh Pathak <sumedh@citusdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Please take part in the PostgreSQL ecosystem
survey
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Sumedh Pathak
Yeah, it didn't really pick up. Ultimately, I think such types of requests are best asked in 'poll' form. The best option might be to restructure this so it can be submitted as a 'poll'.
I misunderstood that your post was a poll. Do you mean your previous post was an "Ask" article and so it didn't get attention as we were afraid?
Then, could you again take the trouble to re-post it as a "poll"? That is, posting one greeting (dummy) question and guide respondents to the original mailing list article like the following example. The below is just an example; any better guiding question would be OK. I'd like to avoid restructure and scatter the responses as much as possible...
--------------------------------------------------
Q: Please select items which you think are necessary for PostgreSQL to improve. You can select multiple choices.
1.Functionality
2.Performance
3.Quality
Interoperability with other software
4.Scalability
5.Availability
6.Manageability
If you chose interoperability, please let us know the details by responding the following poll.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1
-------------------------------------------------
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: