Re: Please take part in the PostgreSQL ecosystem survey
| От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Please take part in the PostgreSQL ecosystem survey |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F5668C5@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Please take part in the PostgreSQL ecosystem survey (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Justin Clift > Out of curiosity, what would you consider "Scalability" (such as > multi-master replication, and others) to fit under? > > It's kind of Functionality, but also kind of Performance. ;) I think it's better to put scalability as a separate choice. Wikipedia says: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalability "A system whose performance improves after adding hardware, proportionally to the capacity added, is said to be a scalablesystem." But in that sense, other non-functional characteristics, like availability and manageability, can be the additional choices,too. Anyway, I just put an example of the dummy (guiding) question. Any interesting alternative dummy question/choices can beok. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: