java.util.concurrent introduces ScheduledExecutorService, which fixes a lot of the problems with java.util.Timer and
introducesmore features.
Specifically, it enqueues timed actions and executes them on a thread pool, providing good controls both for
controllingindividual tasks (canceling) and the entire pool (shutting down cleanly / immediately)
It might be a good fit for implementing timeouts.
On Dec 15, 2011, at 6:17 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Craig,
>
> That is the current implementation. What do you suggest as a more
> robust implementation ?
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
> http://www.credativ.ca
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au> wrote:
>> On 12/15/2011 07:29 PM, Radosław Smogura wrote:
>>>
>>> Long, long time ago I've sent implementation with timers, you need to
>>> search archive If you need this.
>>
>>
>> If it was ages ago, you probably used java.util.Timer, right?
>>
>> java.util.Timer is not suitable for use in a JDBC driver because it doesn't
>> do any exception handling on the timer thread, it's subject to congestion on
>> the timer thread, and it offers no way for the driver to control the timer
>> thread to cleanly shut it down during unload. It's unusable in app servers
>> and not really a great idea anywhere that needs to be robust and
>> long-running.
>>
>> --
>> Craig Ringer
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc