> > I suggested using names to Tom for this reason, but he preferred to use
> > attrelid/attnum.
>
> Oh, and what happenned to the attlognum idea? If something that needs
> it is going to be implemented the column should probably be added now
> and used instead of attnum.
Weeeell, it'd be nice, but I can see ways of doing ALTER COLUMN/SET TYPE
without it, so...
(My work on that has been stalled for a while BTW, due to sheer difficulty!)
Chris