On 7/18/22 02:53, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2022-Jul-18, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
>
>> Hi hackers,
>>
>>>> If someone put a lot of review into a patchset a few months ago, they
>>>> absolutely deserve credit. But if that entry has been sitting with no
>>>> feedback this month, why is it useful to keep that Reviewer around?
>>
>> As I recall, several committers reported before that they use
>> Reviewers field in the CF application when writing the commit message.
>> I would argue that this is the reason.
>
> Maybe we need two separate reviewer columns -- one for credits
> (historical tracking) and one for people currently reviewing a patch.
> So we definitely expect an email "soon" from someone in the second
> column, but not from somebody who is only in the first column.
+1
--
Joe Conway
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com