Re: So what's an "empty" array anyway?
| От | David E. Wheeler |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: So what's an "empty" array anyway? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 0887548F-59E3-467C-8BCA-C7A23DDFDC35@kineticode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: So what's an "empty" array anyway? (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: So what's an "empty" array anyway?
Re: So what's an "empty" array anyway? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Oct 21, 2008, at 12:08, Simon Riggs wrote: > Please remove zero-dimension arrays. > > The number of dimensions of an empty array really ought to be NULL, or > if we fix it to be non-NULL then 1+. Zero just makes a weird case > for no > reason. An empty string only makes sense in the context of that > particular function, it doesn't really help with other maths. If we got rid of zero dimension arrays, how would I declare a new empty array in a PL/pgSQL function? Best, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: