Re: Non-colliding auto generated names
| От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Non-colliding auto generated names |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 073e01c2d714$5efc3560$6500a8c0@fhp.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Non-colliding auto generated names (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Non-colliding auto generated names
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I thought folks wanted them to fail if they conflicted so that they > > could know for sure how to derive such names definitively. Is that > > accurate? > > It sort of bothers me that this patch would make it impossible to > predict with certainty the index names associated with a table. > But I haven't got a better idea... OK, but why would you need to be able to do that? Also, it tells you in the notice. And if your 'name prediction' code can't deal with collisions, then it needs help. Also, what's stopping you specifying the name explicitly? Maybe we could put it to pgsql-general? Chris
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: