On Mar 20, 2011, at 2:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Nikhil Sontakke
>> <nikhil.sontakke@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> Not really a performance issue AFAICS. If the relcache init file exists,
>>> then the phase2 of the catalog cache which eventually calls the above code
>>> path is avoided.
>
>> Oh, that doesn't sound so bad, then.
>
> I want to take a closer look at this one because I thought I'd covered
> all those issues in the last go-round.
Go for it.
...Robert