> On 28 Jul 2025, at 17:29, Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> To move this forward a tiny bit: I would be okay with maintaining a
> new getentropy() case. (I'm less excited about getrandom() because of
> its reduced reach.) And maybe down the line we should discuss choosing
> an option at configure time?
I would not be opposed to starting there.
--
Daniel Gustafsson