Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 061501c2f8b7$f5280720$6500a8c0@fhp.internal обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Just switch to FreeBSD and use UFS ;) Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey D. Brower" <jeff@pointhere.net> To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; "eric soroos" <eric-psql@soroos.net> Cc: "Shankar K" <shan0075@yahoo.com>; <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 4:42 AM Subject: Re: [PERFORM] ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 > OK so am I hearing: > > XFS is the fastest (but is it the safest?) but does not come on Linux. > > Ext2 does less work than Ext3 so is fastest among what DOES come with > Linux - but if you have a crash that fsck can't fix you're hosed. > > Ext3 is quite a bit slower if set to be real safe, a wee bit slower if run > with standard options which makes it more crash-safe, and much slower if the > mount flags are set to metadata journaling but that is much safer as a file > system because the metadata journaling is complementary to the PG > transactioning. > > To determine which you want you must choose which one feels to you like the > right balance of speed and the setup work you are willing to perform and > maintain. > > Do I have it right? > > Jeff > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: