Re: On-disk Tuple Size

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rod Taylor
Тема Re: On-disk Tuple Size
Дата
Msg-id 05db01c1e938$6085b3e0$8001a8c0@jester
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: On-disk Tuple Size  (Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Having per-transaction command IDs might allow us to reduce the
range of
> the t_cmin and t_cmax fields. Unfortunately, probably by not all
that
> much, since one doesn't want to limit the number of commands within
a
> single transaction to something as silly as 65536.

If you can figure out how to make that roll over sure, but thats a
very small number.

Consider users who do most of their stuff via functions (one
transaction).  Now consider the function that builds reports, stats,
etc. for some department.  It's likley these work on a per account
basis.

We have a function making invoices that would wrap around that atleast
10x.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation on page files
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: On-disk Tuple Size