Re: The tragedy of SQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rob Sargent
Тема Re: The tragedy of SQL
Дата
Msg-id 05ac2565-b692-c73f-93f0-3bbf738e3bfc@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The tragedy of SQL  (Guyren Howe <guyren@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: The tragedy of SQL  (Raymond Brinzer <ray.brinzer@gmail.com>)
Re: The tragedy of SQL  (Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com>)
Re: The tragedy of SQL  (Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 9/13/21 11:51 PM, Guyren Howe wrote:
They are making a decent decision. SQL is a *fucking terrible* language, which I don’t blame them for not wanting to learn.

The whole industry, programming languages, infrastructure, everything would have developed differently if relations were a natural, pleasurable thing to use in any programming language. Like an Array, or a Hash.
On Sep 13, 2021, 22:45 -0700, Hemil Ruparel <hemilruparel2002@gmail.com>, wrote:
SQL is not the problem. Problem are the devs. I love SQL. I hate orms. The problem with databases is people refuse to treat it as the entity it is and want to use their beautiful OO system. Problem is databases are not OO. We need to recognize that and treat databases as databases. 
All languages are fucking terrible.  There are thousands of the them because some people bump into a feature they don't like and run off an make another fucking terrible language.  For the love of God, please don't be one of those people.  The rest of us find languages we can abide and do productive things with using features we like and avoiding those we don't.  I've always felt it was no small miracle the vendors managed to agree to ODBC/JDBC driver specs (even though the SQL language definition is "more like guidelines").  Go scream at the DOM and JavaScript.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Guyren Howe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The tragedy of SQL
Следующее
От: Raymond Brinzer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The tragedy of SQL