On 2024/09/21 4:07, Noah Misch wrote:
> Non-superuser vacuumdb
> must be rare indeed for this to go unnoticed long enough to leave all
> supported branches affected.
Yes.
And more users might notice this in v17 or later, since v17 supports
the maintain privilege. Some users may want to use a role with
the maintain privilege to run vacuumdb. If they forget to grant USAGE
privilege on the temp table's schema to that role, they'll encounter
the same issue.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION