Re: Correction for vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age

On Tue, 2021-10-12 at 08:22 +0300, Pavel Luzanov wrote:
> When trying to make a link to the new vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age parameter,
> I found the wrong ID for this guc (missed word vacuum).
> Please consider this patch for a fix.

It is good to be consistent, but the name of the link is not essential, is it?
Changing it might break existing outside links.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe